Older adults should receive a high-dose or adjuvanted flu vaccine

Updated:

cdc-unsplash

At a time when seasonal influenza remains a major public health challenge, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic say their latest findings could usher in a more nuanced era for flu vaccine design, one that differentiates between younger and older adult populations, instead of relying solely on a universal strategy.

In a newly published, though not yet peer-reviewed, cohort study involving over 53,000 working-age employees, vaccinated individuals had a higher incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza during the 2024-25 season compared with their unvaccinated peers—yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of –26.9%.

The authors and other experts caution that this outcome does not necessarily mean the vaccine caused increased infection—but rather that the vaccine, in that real-world scenario, failed to substantially prevent infections in that specific group.

Key take-aways

  1. Age matters: The study cohort was primarily working-age adults (health-care workers), with very few older adults or children represented. As a result, findings for older adults remain uncertain.
  2. Strain-match and formulation issues: As with all influenza vaccines, effectiveness depends on how well the selected vaccine strains match circulating viruses—the study reinforces that a poor match can dramatically reduce protection.
  3. Different needs for older adults: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) already recommends that people 65 and older receive a high-dose or adjuvanted flu vaccine, rather than a standard-dose one, because older immune systems respond less robustly.

What this means for older vs. younger adults

For younger healthy adults, the study suggests that standard formulations may not always deliver strong protection—especially in seasons with less-well-matched strains. That raises questions about whether alternative formulations (e.g., higher antigen load, adjuvants, newer platforms) should be considered even for this group.

For older adults, the implications are even more urgent. Their immune systems typically generate weaker responses and have a higher risk of severe outcomes. Thus, combining insights from this Cleveland Clinic study with existing recommendations suggests vaccine developers and public-health authorities should:

  • Consider age-tailored vaccine formulations, perhaps with different antigen contents or adjuvant systems for younger vs. older adults.
  • Evaluate alternate vaccine platforms (e.g., recombinant-protein, cell-based, mRNA) more actively in older populations.
  • Monitor not just infection incidence but also severity reduction, hospitalizations and deaths—particularly in seniors, where vaccine benefit may be more about preventing serious complications than preventing every infection.

The Cleveland Clinic is already running a new “Influenza Immunity Surveillance in Adults” study enrolling individuals aged 18-90 to examine how individual characteristics relate to vaccine responses.