Advertising Disclosure

Court halts debt relief program allegedly targeting seniors and veterans

The Federal Trade Commission asked for the action after an investigation

Updated:

Avatar photo
By:
Avatar photo

Mark Huffman
Reporter

Mark Huffman has covered consumer issues since 2004, with a special focus on protecting and empowering older adults. A former news correspondent for the Associated Press Radio Network, Westwood One, and ConsumerAffairs, Mark brings decades of journalistic experience to RetirementLiving.com. He is passionate about giving consumers a voice and helping them make informed decisions. Mark has also created educational content, including Senior Scam Alert, a video resource designed to help seniors recognize and avoid fraud. He holds a B.A. from the University of Kentucky and lives with his family in Richmond, Virginia.
Debt Consolidation | Retirement Living

Key Insights

  • Federal court halts $100M debt relief scam targeting seniors and veterans.
  • FTC alleges impersonation of banks, government agencies, and illegal debt practices.
  • Victims left deeper in debt; one veteran nearly lost a job due to credit damage.

At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal court has issued a temporary restraining order to halt a deceptive and damaging debt relief operation known as “Accelerated Debt.” 

The FTC claimed in court documents that the company defrauded older Americans, including veterans, out of more than $100 million by falsely claiming to significantly reduce unsecured debt while engaging in a wide range of illegal and unethical practices.

The FTC’s complaint targets seven companies and three individuals accused of running the “Accelerated Debt” program. The agency asserts that the defendants lured vulnerable consumers through deceptive marketing tactics, such as falsely impersonating consumers’ banks, credit card companies, and even government agencies. The FTC claims the defendants also made baseless promises of reducing debts by up to 75%. 

Christopher Mufarrige, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, condemned the operation, emphasizing its particularly harmful impact.

“What makes this case especially egregious is the defendants’ targeting of older Americans and veterans,” Mufarrige said.

The consequences

The alleged scam, which operated as a common enterprise, reportedly used telemarketing calls, direct mail, and online ads to attract customers. Once engaged, the companies allegedly convinced consumers to stop paying their credit cards and instead make payments to the defendants, who collected illegal advance fees.

The FTC outlined several specific alleged violations, including:

  • Impersonating financial institutions and government entities to gain trust.
  • Charging advance fees in violation of the law.
  • Accessing credit reports without permission.
  • Using prohibited remotely created checks.
  • Ignoring “Do Not Call” registry rules.

The FTC said an Army veteran found himself $13,000 deeper in debt after enrolling in the program and was nearly stripped of his security clearance required for employment, as his credit score fell from the high 700s to the 500s.

Another consumer, a retired and disabled veteran, reportedly had to use his entire retirement savings to cover debts that ballooned due to the defendants’ false promises and illegal upfront charges approaching $10,000.

The FTC’s action seeks monetary relief for affected consumers and accuses the defendants of violating multiple federal laws, including the FTC Act, the telemarketing sales rule, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.